Demonocracy
by Jack Xamis, Ph.D.
In times of deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary
act.
George Orwell.
1. Demon, Demon, Whos Got the Demon
Ask people to name one of historys bad guys, and chances are
the answer will be "Hitler."
In addition to his many other misfortunes, Hitler had the bad luck to be the first bad
guy to do his stuff in the media age. Previous bad guys (Caligula, Attila the Hun, Ivan
the Terrible, etc.) got their reputations slowly, through word of mouth, but the reality
of Hitlers atrocities spread quickly, through newspapers, radio, newsreels.
After the war was over, and the scale of Hitlers atrocities became clear, we
elevated him from bad guy to demon, evil incarnate.
Certainly he was one of historys all-time bad guys. But a demon?
The danger in this kind of knee-jerk, over-the-top condemnation is that it allows us
the comfort and convenience of dividing the world into us vs. them, us good guys vs. them
bad guys.
We, the good guys, may make mistakes, but goldurnit, were trying our best, while
they, those demonic bad guys, theyre something else altogether, like, Satan
incarnate.
Didnt somebody once offer a little parable about the mote in your neighbors
eye vs. the beam in your own eye?

2. Satans Among Us?
I find myself thinking lately about what life in Berlin must have
been like in the mid-1930s.
Germany was not only healing the disastrous wounds from World War I but was quickly
modernizing itself into a major industrialand militarypower. Think what pride
of accomplishment must have suffused the populace. Think how glorious life must have
seemed to the hard-working Berliners as they stepped out into their bustling city on fine
spring days.
Sure, there was hate in the air, but if you were not in one of the groups toward which
the hate was directed it was easy to ignore the hatred, to not think about it, to pretend
it didnt exist.
Even as the hate began to become unavoidably visible, many, perhaps most, Germans
simply got on with their lives. As did the rest of the world.
Everybody knew the Jews were fleeing, but who paid attention? Not the churches,
certainly not the German government, and perhaps most strangely, not even other
governments elsewhere in the world.
Was Hitler a demon then? Well, sure, we say NOW. We just didnt realize it at the
time.
The truth is, he was no demon then, and hes no demon now. He was a human being,
with his own collection of biases and ideas, who through a combination of luck, skill, and
circumstance, achieved a place of power where he could inflict those biases and ideas on
many people with catastrophic results. His crimes were horrific. But a demon? No.

3. American Crops
Now we have an American government run by people with their own
collection of biases and ideas, some of which are extreme. In less stressful times they
would most likely not have acted on their more extreme biases and ideas. And if they acted
on them, they wouldnt have found much support.
But circumstancesprimarily the events of 9-11have put those people under
duress, in a posture of fear and anger, a place where they begin to dismantle the Bill of
Rights, where they attack other nations at will. And where they find massive support
throughout the government and the media. And they justify it all as "the defense of
freedom."
Are these people demons? No.
Are they new Hitlers? No.
Are they evil? No.
Are they dangerous? Yes. For many reasons, not least because theyand to some
degreemany others fall into the easy trap of seeing Hitler and his terrible ilk as
monsters, somehow belonging to a different category of humans who are so reprehensible
that we view them as non-human.
Certainly, they and we easily believe, our leaders are not in that category of
monstrosities, where we, without thinking the matter through, wall off the likes of Hitler
and Stalin.
Americans would NEVER do anything like Hitler and Stalin did.
It's a slippery slope this government is now on. Having implemented a series of
reactions to 9-11, the United States finds itself in a kind of escalation of responses. At
what point will the brakes be applied? The danger comes from the psychological fact that
we think all the world's Hitlers are these non-human monsters, to which our own behavior
can never bear any meaningful relation.
American leaders can now undertake just about any action and get away with it because
1) they sayand we believetheyre doing it in defense of freedom, and 2)
they are not monsters.
Us vs. them. Good guys vs. bad guys.
How simple the world then becomes: "If you are not with us, you are against
us."
Since this is a war on terrorism, and since the terrorists are evildoers, then if you
are not with us, you are an evildoer.
How, please, is this behavior, this blanket condemnation of anyone who disagrees,
different from Hitlers own demonization of the Jews?
The present American leader is quick to point out that he only means Osama bin Laden
(and well maybe Saddam Hussein, and well maybe Iran
) and his guys are evil, but
certainly not all Muslims.
And then here comes Franklin Graham, son of Billy Grahan, THE icon of American
Protestant Christianity, announcing on television that Islam is an evil religion.
Wheres the difference from Hitlers view of the Jews?
Is Franklin Graham a demon? No.
Is Franklin Graham evil? No.
George W. Bush? No.
But where does the name-calling stop, and where do the escalating reactions against the
condemend slow?

4. Demonocracy.
A very, very small percentage of human beings are so lacking in
compassion that we call them sociopaths. Their indifferent, sometimes murderous behavior
is as baffling as it is appalling. And no doubt in the course of history some sociopaths
have risen to positions of leadership and have been able to inflict enormous suffering.
Such anomalies are rare.
Most of the time, the panoply of political and military behavior that we observe and,
if we get in the way, experience first-hand is the behavior of people in leadership
positions who believe that they are doing their best under the difficult circumstances
life has put them in.
Did Hitler get up every morning thinking, "Let me see. What wonderfully evil
things can I accomplish today?" Of course not.
Do our present alleged monsters get up and ask themselves that question? Of course not.
And you can bet the present president prides himself on his daily activities as those
of a man making the world safe for democracy.
No matter that his attorney general is slowly dismantling the Bill of Rights. No matter
that his Secretary of Defense leads massive invasions of countries which have not attacked
the United States. No matter that his Secretary of the Interior is destroying 30 years of
laws protecting the environment. No matter that this is all done with the hearty approval
of a Congress and judiciary controlled by his party.
Evil monsters? No.
As serious a threat to world peace and American democracy as any of those earlier
well-intentioned but severely misguided leaders of the 20th century? Just possibly. Not
yet, but eventually.
What should we call a government that sees the mote in other eyes but not the beam in
its own eye, a government that sees all who disagree with it as not just enemies but as
evil? How about: "demonocracy." A government that sees evil everywhere but fails
to see that in the long run it is its own worst enemy.
The prediction is an old onethat if fascism ever comes to America it will do so
wrapped in the flag, riding on a beautiful white horse and singing the praises of the
"American way of life."
We may be decades past the year that Orwell chose to use as the name of his novel, but
it would seem that 1984 is very much with us in this administration which uses words to
mean precisely whatever it wants them to mean:
Always there will be the intoxication of power
Always, at every moment, there will be the thrill of
victory, the sensation of trampling on an enemy
who is helpless. If you want a picture of the future,
imagine a boot stamping on a human face--for ever.
--George Orwell, 1984.
Peace is war.
Love is hate.
Democracy is demonocracy.