It is well-known that nothing much of importance happened in the world before the
first airing of the Ed Sullivan Show on June 20,1948.
The few events of interest before that date can be generally handled by a one-hour
National Geographic Special or, in the case of major stories such as the history of
baseball, by a Ken Burns mini-series. Those efforts, plus the occasional biopic when an
unusually good script comes along (Shakespeare in
Love, Gladiator, Titanic), pretty well take care of the human past.
This shortsightedness, which is in fact blindness, explains why current culture sees
lightweight persons such as Tom Brokaw and Stephen Ambrose as "guardians" of
"history." "History," you understand, in this context means
approximately the glory that was Guadalcanal, the grandeur that was Patton.
In this shallow misunderstanding of the past, suffering, maiming, and death are
qualities of history which not only happen offstage, they are so distant from the onstage
"heroism," so far from the reality of present-day celebrity, that they hardly
exist at all.
The suffering and death in the past is of interest only as messy afterbirth which gave
the world "great" personalities of the kind worthy of attention by modern media
and, thus, modern thinkers as well.
Which leads us to the headline on the first page of the Arts and Leisure section of The
New York Times, December 29, 2001:
2001s Lessons: We Must Go On; We Can Go On.
Truly, a headline whose petty self-centeredness and whose extraordinary ignoring of
history are breath-taking, embarrassing, and, probably, in the long run, very dangerous.
Yes, the 3,000 deaths of September 11 were shocking, tragic. All who watched were to
some degree traumatized, changed.
And yes, the particular form of insanity called "terrorism" now loose in the
world is frightening and requires decisive action, both short-term and long-term.
But our grandstanding reaction to September 11 has generally been that of a spoiled,
over-protected, rich kid who finally escaped his governess, climbed a tree, fell, and
broke an arm.
This is NOT to trivialize those who died on September 11, and especially not those who
died trying to prevent more deaths: the firefighters and others who kept going UP the
stairs in the World Trade Center, the persons who refused to let Flight 93 become another
terrorist missile.
This is rather to serve as a reminder that the suffering which humanity inflicted on
itself on September 11 is almost minuscule when viewed open-eyed in the light of history,
in the light of the suffering which history shows us we are capable of experiencing in
this world.
Our grief over 3,000 violent, unnecessary deaths is real and valid and important. But
if we forget the far, far greater grief of the past, what then? What then?
So.
The
Key to the Chart: