
Alphabet Soup:
Drugs in America

DTM: The Spirit Molecule
by Rick Strassman, M.D.
Reviewed by Ceci Lumley
I was in a void of darkness. Suddenly, beings appeared. They were cloaked, like
silhouettes. They were glad to see me.
--DMT subject, from DMT: The Spirit Molecule.
1. The Visible Backstory of Drugs in America
Someone asked Gandhi his opinion of American civilization.
His reply: "I think it would be a good idea."
The United States was constructed by a collective consciousness shaped by three drugs:
alcohol, caffeine, and nicotine. Nobodys written (or, as far as I know, even tried
to write) the definitive history of the effects of those drugs on American civilization
(pace, Gandhi).
That America is a drug-based culture is, naturally, not a popular truth. It hardly fits
with the self-sufficient image of manly, wilderness-taming denial still popular among
super-patriots and myopic religionists.
Ever in denial, the more demonstrative neo-puritans among us have railed mainly against
alcohol. Their complaints culminated in the disastrous anti-alcohol experiment of the
1920s called Prohibition. Everybody eventually realized that making one of the Big
Three Drugs illegal just wasnt going to work, so Prohibition was cancelled and for a
while we coasted along more or less undisturbed in our tripartite national high.
Lately we have begun again to tinker with the approved American dope mix. Rather than
making cigarettes illegal, the anti-tobacconists
are now using a combination of brain-washing (advertising), selective restriction
("NIMR", i.e., Not in MY Restaurant), and exorbitant taxation.
2. The Invisible Backstory of Drugs in
America
Quietly, through the centuries of altered American consciousness, as a kind of figured
bass which youre not aware of unless you pay really close attention to the music,
there was always another strain of dope at work. For a long time it was simple and
herb-based.
Marijuana, in its many forms, grows wild, widely, and well across North America, and
nobody knows how much was smoked, nor when, nor where, nor by whom. It was there, all
along, and only the most blindered puritan could deny that more than a few of our
much-admired, hardy forebears were puffing away.
Historically, stronger, imported stuff was also easily available from your local
apothecary. Until the 20th century, morphine, in a concoction known as "laudanum,"
was a commonly used panacea and pick-me-up (or let-me-down, as you will), providing a
convenient break from the rigors of nation-building, slave-holding, and
wilderness-conquering.
And not to forget that, still writ very large on billboards around the world, we have
the name of the drink that made Atlanta famous, announcing for all to see the fact that
cocaine itself was an ingredient in the original, famous "secret formula" locked
away in a vault on Peachtree Street. Coca-Cola indeed.
Next thing you know, around the turn of the 20th century, here came ol Beelzebub
fooling with music, which hitherto had been used as one of the controlling tools of good
old-time religion. Before long, he was seducing the young and innocent with the off-beat
of syncopation (the evil of rags) and the pellucid moan of blues-colored quarter-tones
(the subversive dangers of jazz). When the mode of the music changes, the walls of the
city tremble.
The altered consciousness of the new music was fertile soil for the perception
enhancing drugs already out there in the underground culture.
It was all very marginal, and safely repressed as a racial or "bohemian"
thing, until all hell broke loose in the 1960s and suddenly the well-brought-up kids of
Sunday-go-to-meeting parents were off at the university learning 1) to think, 2) to feel,
and 3) to generally explore and raise hell outside of the box of the burbs.
First came marijuana. Then LSD. Peyote. Psilocybin. STP. DMT. PCP.
And finally, of course, the ultimate product of the alphabetization of drugs in uptight
America: DEA. With lots of huzzahs and billions of bucks, the powers that continue to be
proclaimed that their dope was the only dope and anybody elses dope would henceforth
and by God be extremely ILLEGAL. And furthermore, theyd set up a huge, expensive,
vain bureaucracy, the Drug Enforcement Agency, to wage a huge, expensive, futile war
against you-know-what.
Alcohol, nicotine, caffeine? No prob. Say yes as much as you want. But for the rest of
the alphabet soup, if you know whats good for you, sweet Nancy kept reminding us,
you sure as hell better say NO and say it loud and clear.
Prohibition by any other name, yes?
If we announce were against it, and spend billions of dollars fighting it,
thats all that matters.
Ignore the forbidden fruit effect.
Believe the DEA statistics.
Ignore the fact that in the halls of every high school in the land you can arrange to
get just about any part of the alphabet soup you want. Cheap.
Smile contentedly as the horrific public service commercials play across all channels.
Ignore the knowing grins of the young whose media-immersed antennae are so acutely
sensitive to adult bullshit that they can spot propaganda coming 10 megahertz away.
As with all great empires, America defines the world and then pretends nothing outside
its self-definition exists. Drugwise, no matter that humans have been smoking, munching,
ingesting, and shooting up every plant they could get their hands on since Day One. No
matter that humans will continue to do that whether Nancy Reagan likes it or not.
Are the drugs dangerous? Of course. Sometimes extremely dangerous. But how safe was
life in the 20th century when humans killed 200 million of each other? Oops. I forgot.
That was legal murder, called "war".
You would think that a reasonable society would agree that the best way to deal with
the dangers of some of the available drugs would be through research. Study them, plot
their effects, learn what the drugs do and how they do it. Are they dangerous all the
time, in all settings, in all doses, for all people? Or are some of them in some doses and
in some settings profoundly transcendental? Are some just plain fun?
Those are important questions to which we, at this late date, still dont have
answers.
Because around 1970 just about all research came to a stop. No career-minded scientist
would or, legally, could touch LSD, or any of the other mind-benders.
After a couple of decades of denial, even the managers of the anti-drug war began to
realize that they needed to know more about their enemies. In the early 1990s, a lone
doctor, working in Albuquerque, broke the barrier. He managed to obtain government funding
for a study of one of the drugs: DMT, di-methyl-tryptamine. It was the first legal study
of a psychedelic in 30 years.
3. New Mexico High
Rick Strassman, M.D. and psychiatrist, administered DMT to some 60 people in a
carefully controlled clinical setting. Using the best scientific protocols, he set
parameters and record responses.
He wrote a book about what happened: DMT: The Spirit Molecule.
Not all was sweetness and light in the year-long project. The settinga hospital
room, as Strassman was aware, was difficult, not especially conducive to metaphysical
breakthroughs. But Strassman and his co-workers were sensitive to that and other problems
as well. Not every subject responded well to DMT. There were a few bad trips. But on the
whole, one senses that Strassman set up and ran a pioneering research project under
challenging conditions with a great deal of humane insight.
IF you
feel the present ruling class (political, scientific, technological, religious,
educational, commercial) is running around naked in a terrible and dangerous parody of the
Kings New Clothes,
IF you
suspect that theres more to life that accumulating money, toys, orgasms, fame, and
emotionally dependent children,
IF the
vaunted information revolution seems to you to be a mile wide and an inch deep,
IF your
401K provides little warmth and less light for the dark night of your soul,
Then you should read this book.
Why?
Hope. It offers startling hope in the form of glimpses throughto borrow the
excellent trope of an earlier book titlea crack in the cosmic egg.
Like LSD, DMT is a powerful psychedelic. It profoundly alters your perceptions. Unlike
LSD, it is fast-acting (within a minute or two of ingestion, youre THERE),
short-term (30 minutes later youre back), and without appreciable side- or
after-effects.
Just two of Strassmans findings, and that will be enough for you to decide
whether to get the book.
1. More than 50% of his subjects had coherent, realistic encounters with sentient
beings who interacted intelligently. Further, many of these beings looked and behaved very
much like those creatures described by so-called UFO abductees.
2. Many of Strassmans subjects entered a life-altering, transcendental state.
Strassman, well-trained scientist that he is, is well aware of the many clever ways
present conservative scientific thought dismisses such reports as hallucinatory. He goes
to some pains to explain why he came to believe that what his subjects experienced through
DMT was no more a hallucination than what you see every morning when you wake up.
Excerpt from one subjects report:
I was in a void of darkness. Suddenly, beings appeared. They were cloaked, like
silhouettes. They were glad to see me. They indicated that they had had contact with me as
an individual before. They seemed pleased that we had discovered this technology
They wanted to learn more about our physical bodies. They told me humans exist on many
levels
Later the same subject had DMT again:
I went directly into deep space. They knew I was coming back and they were ready
for me. They told me there were many things they could share with us when we learn how to
make more extended contact
While Strassman quotes extensively, and fascinatingly, from subject reports, much of
the book is concerned with, first, an overview of psychedelics and then a summary of the
difficulties he had to overcome in getting the approval and money for the project. At the
end, he goes on at length about how and why the project wound down, and concludes with
lengthy speculation about what it all means.
Much of the writing is disjointed and this reader longed for fuller excerpts from the
subject reports.
4. An Analogy
Casting about for a helpful comparison, I came up with this analogy. Strassmans
book is sort of like one of those "world" maps from, say, 1450 or 1500. Europe
is there pretty accurately. And maybe a good chunk of Africa. To the east, Asia trails off
into an amorphous blob, while to the west, across the Atlantic, North and South America
exist only as a few uncertain squiggles.
It took a long time and a lot of people exploring before we found out the true lay of
the planetary land.
DMT: The Spirit Molecule gives us a faint sketch of an early map of the
invisible worlds which the powerful interests of present-day reductive, materialistic
science are determined to keep us from exploring.
Pro-drug? Yes and no. Strassman himself comes from a background of deep and active
immersion in Zen Buddhism. He is aware, as is any intelligent and open-minded explorer,
that drugs are only one among many possible keys which with the right set and in the right
setting can open the doors of perception. Whatever their methoddrugs, meditation,
yoga, prayerexplorers keep going out, having experiences, and reporting back. At
some point, the dominant culture must begin to listen, and wonder.
END

Want more info?
"DMT: The Spirit Molecule"
takes you to amazon.com.
Rick
Strassman's site is here.
Back to Magellan's
Log 32
Magellan's
Log front page
Send this page to a friend.

|