
The Age of Emesis:
1900-2000
by Diebold
Essen
The Greeks, and thus us, were big on mimesis,
which means "imitation." Art imitates life. That art is best, most beautiful,
greatest, which most successfully imitates life and nature. Rockwell or Rembrandt, take
your choice.
We are just emerging from an era, known as "the 20th century," which rejected
mimesis. Arrogant from our growing control of nature (so we thought), we turned to emesis:
vomit. For our recently departed century, that art was best, greatest, which most
successfully produced a spewing out of waste and sepsis.
Shock the middle-class: épater le bourgeois.
The museums and private collections of the world are now filled with emetic art
products of the 20th century. Some, only a few, the future will treasure, because even
emesis can be touched by genius. Most will be seen for the fecal matter that they are and
discarded as trash.
Scholars will want to retain samples of the most egregious stuff, to help them remember
and understand. Those samples will wind up not in art museums, for they are not art, but
in museums of cultural history.
A reaction to the century of vomit will come. People, learned and unlearned, will
forget why we vomited. Humbled by the spilled blood and raped enviornment of the 20th
century, we will slowly learn to see that the nightmares that were real for for the 20th
century are only savage stories. The art, the music, the poetry, the novels, the drama,
and even the politics of emesis will mostly produce a future reaction of, well, emesis.
Stomachs will truly churn, not at the disease called man, but at the disease called
modernity and so-called post-modernity, the emesis of the twentieth century.
Schoenberg? Barf. Guernica?
Barf. Joyce? Barf. Milton Babbitt? Barf. Milton Friedman? Barf. The great dictators? Barf.
Schnabel? Barf. De Kooning? Barf. Bacon? Barf. Hemingway? Barf. And so on. Emetics all.
The 200 million war-dead, the violent art, the merciless exploitation of free-market
capitalism--all of a gorge-raising piece.
What will be left? What will be our legacy? The thin, bright thread of mystical truth
and beauty woven almost invisibly through the vast, filthy shroud of the age of emesis.
Lawrence. Rothko. Pärt. And so on. Tiny lights in a dark, stinking maze from which,
staggered and staggering, we now slowly emerge.
Yes, nature is red in tooth and claw, but only when necessary, for
hunger or defense. To take that red as the basis and justification for the construction of
a rabid and rapacious human society is not only stupid but self-defeating. Stupid, because
the red, the blood spilled in nature, is intermittent: the animal is hungry, the animal is
threatened. Self-defeating, because when humans resort, for reasons of pride and power, to
violence they don't know when to stop. And we get to a place of MADness, a place of mutual
assured destruction.
Nowhere in nature will you find such madness.
What you will find in nature almost everywhere almost all of the
time, of course, of course, is what we have lost, what we have forgotten: beauty. It
should be no surprise that our artists came to vomit massively at our own escalating
violence. It was sick, and sickening.
It should now be no surprise that our artists begin the slow,
timorous turn back to the re-discovery of beauty, guided as always by nature.
Send this page to a friend.
Back
to Magellan's Log 16
Magellan's
Log front page

|